Pashinyan proves with this discourse that not only is the Artsakh issue not closed, but that betrayal remains at their throat. Tigran Abrahamyan
With this discourse, Pashinyan proves that not only is this issue not closed, but that betrayal remains at their throats.
Tigran Abrahamyan, secretary of the NA "I Have Honor" faction, wrote on his Facebook page:
"Pashinyan's notes on the negotiation process on the Artsakh issue were discussed from various perspectives the day before yesterday.
In my opinion, they contained 2 main nuances that were either not discussed or not given much attention amidst the general noise.
First, despite the fact that after the Azerbaijani aggression and occupation of 2023, the entire Communist Party elite tried with all their might to convince the public that the right thing to do was to hand over Artsakh and tried to justify themselves, sometimes also trying to show that such an issue no longer exists, Pashinyan proves with his discourse that not only is that issue not closed, but that betrayal has remained at their throats.
Secondly, in actual ideological terms, the one who considered Artsakh to be Azerbaijan, who thought that there was no alternative and that the right thing to do was to hand over Artsakh, has given a self-confessed testimony that he not only lied from the beginning, declaring in 2018 that the Artsakh issue should be resolved based on the principle of the right to self-determination, but also took the process in the completely opposite direction.
Moreover, exacerbating the situation, he went to the bank in August 2019, declaring at Artsakh's Renaissance Square, "Artsakh is Armenia and that's it."
They have sacrificed Armenian interests in front of everyone, which has led to enormous human and territorial consequences for Armenia and Artsakh.
There is no topic of political debate here, especially with the participation of former presidents.
The only thing that exists and should happen after the change of power is to give a legal assessment of what Pashinyan and his elite have done and not done and to take the process in that direction.
PS: Or should I debate with Serzh Sargsyan or other presidents? You initially chose a completely different path - to ally with the enemies of our people and work against your own compatriots, and now you have found yourself in a hopeless situation and are trying to choose the path of irresponsibility and escape that is typical of your type."
