Politics against rivers of blood. Vahe Hovhannisyan
This is no longer politics, this is ONE person's mockery of his own people. Says. "It is very important to record that for the first time Armenia and Azerbaijan have resolved an issue at the table." In 2018-2019 resolve the Karabakh issue at the table, and stop the war at the table on October 19, who was interfering or were they interfering? Vahe Hovhannisyan, a member of the "Alternative Projects" group, wrote about this on his Facebook page.
"Former director of NSS A. Vanetsyan told from the platform at one of the rallies that during the demonstration of wood cutters in Tavush, Nikol told the security forces. "I want to see rivers of blood, kill them all." Now a great calamity was brought to the quiet and lovely Tavush.
The only way is to oppose it with politics
This is really not politics anymore, and also because there is no political system in front of the "honorable" to hold his hand. Our resistance cannot be left to the hope of a Bishop, a group of figures and "300 people from Tavush". This is very little. The story of "300 Spartans" was long ago and mythical. Without an organized political system, how will we give political content to our struggle? How will we give political content to the post-war phase? How are we going to get out of this hell, avoiding war, after all ONE soul and, according to him, the whole West accepted that it is Azerbaijan and that's it?
We have reached the point where, in fact, political parties, figures, and factions are already saying that we are not engaged in politics. They say so with their behavior and content.
If we do not make the preservation of the state a political topic and turn it into a political process with its content and its tools, then we will either have an imitation of a struggle (like the months of the siege of Artsakh), or an adventure (there are already signs of this), or in the best case, a failure of the cause with honest motives.
In this situation, the only word worthy of attention and valuable is the political content, the proposal of political solutions, the political emphasis of the issue. The claim that there are no leaders is a lie, this is the reason for this situation.
Specifically, in Tavush (or from Tavush), leaders are formed in real struggle: Bagrat Srbazan, Garnik Danielyan, Suren Petrosyan and others. Our struggle should be political-nationwide, questions and steps should be purely political.
This document was born insidiously at the moment when serious proposals were being formulated in Armenia to correct the situation. why, how?
Did M. Grigoryan the authority to sign such a document.
This document was obviously not written in one day, and the RA authorities deceived the people until the last day.
This National Assembly has nothing to discuss anymore, except for the situation created in Tavush.
The political field of Armenia must be serious in not allowing "rivers of blood", any adventure, any local struggle in Tavush. This is not a question of villages, this is a question of RA statehood.
Nikol Pashinyan put Armenia in an extremely difficult situation by announcing in advance that these territories belong to Azerbaijan, and this fact was taken into account by the international community.
It is necessary to start intensive political consultations with the participation of all capable forces, units and individuals. Create a broad format of struggle with the participation of all public circles.
Today, the most serious politics is the anti-party movement, where the questions 1-6 mentioned will be raised (these are very important questions, shedding light on many things)_ and will excite the public and lead to profound political changes in the country.
The localization or domestication of the process will be an extreme adventure - the problem of Tavush or the problem of Tavush, Kirantsi - Kirantsu, Voskepar, etc. The insidious birth of the document has already put all of us in an extremely dangerous situation, the only way out is political changes, which will lead to a relaxation of tension within the country and at the country's borders.
