TIGRAN ARZAKANTSYAN "GAVED THE FIGHT" "IMENMINIMTSINER" AND HOVHANNES DAVT BETWEEN JAN

Vazgen Saghatelyan, co-author of the "Imnemnimi" podcast, posted on his Facebook page.

"Hovhannes Davtyan, a humorist, yesterday on his Tiktok page, referred to our previous edition of the "Imnemnimi" podcast, whose guest was Tigran Arzakantsyan, and called the project "an incomprehensible, slavish program".

What was the subject in question?

Tigran Arzakantsyan, trying to remember (as it turned out) Hovhannes, who often does his impersonations, says during the conversation: "What was that gyad's name, Hovhannes...", we think it is with Azoyan, because it fits the description, Arzakantsyan, Davtyan. After that, he starts admonishing this young man to do less "monkeying" and so on. We just listen to the speech of the guest on our program. We neither confirm nor add to it, nor have we followed the comedian's creative activity in order to delve deeper.

so

Hovhannes Davtyan, you see, a person who makes humor and especially imitations considers that the other person should be tolerant, take lightly that he, and in some cases also his wife, are made fun of through various jokes and, therefore, he should be more tolerant than others. : In this context, I was surprised by your harsh reaction to that one word of Arzakantsyan, but that is your problem and his, I am interested in our part.

The platform on which the guest says something is not responsible for it, that's simple logic. When we give a qualification, we are ready to follow that qualification to the end and answer for our words. We neither know you, nor are you from the field of interest to us, so let's leave it alone and deal with you now. You have unreasonably allowed yourself to make statements that, if we go after them, I don't think you will like them. We would not want a conflict resolution, because we consider that a person can make a mistake, not know, give in to emotions, etc., but we also consider it necessary to accept that mistake and respond appropriately. Therefore, I suggest you apologize to us for the offense on the same platform today. If this does not happen, then we will have to give you time on our airwaves, expanding the scope of our interests. I hope you spare us the need to refer to you, but of course the decision is yours.''